When the U.S. banned the transatlantic slave trade in 1808, Southern plantation owners could no longer import Africans. To meet rising demand for labour, they turned inward, breeding enslaved Africans already in the country. At the heart of this system was Virginia, a state that, by the 19th century, became widely regarded as the slave-breeding capital of the United States.
Slavery in America began in the early 17th century when the first enslaved Africans were brought to the English colony of Virginia in 1619. For over 180 years, enslaved Africans were captured, sold, and shipped across the Atlantic Ocean to the Americas, where they were forced to work on plantations that drove the economies of both the North and South. The profitability of crops like tobacco, cotton, sugar, and rice relied heavily on the continuous flow of enslaved labour.
But in 1808, a major shift occurred: the United States officially banned the transatlantic slave trade, making it illegal to import enslaved Africans into the country. Though slavery itself remained legal, this law brought an end to new foreign supplies of enslaved Africans. Yet demand for labour, especially in the expanding cotton fields of the Deep South, continued to grow rapidly.
With no more Africans to import, slaveholders looked inward. They began to rely on forced reproduction, turning the bodies of enslaved Black women and men into tools for economic gain. This horrific practice gave rise to a new industry, one that would make Virginia the epicenter of slave breeding in America.
The Rise of Breeding as a Business
Virginia, by the early 1800s, had one of the largest populations of enslaved Africans in the United States. But while Virginia’s tobacco economy was declining, the need for labour in states like Mississippi, Alabama, and Louisiana was exploding due to the cotton boom.
Rather than freeing enslaved Africans they no longer “needed,” Virginia slaveholders began to breed and sell them to other states. Wealth was no longer measured solely by how many enslaved people one owned, but by how many children enslaved women could produce. Though rarely named in public records, this system was widely practiced and became known as slave breeding.
Girls as young as 13 were forced into childbearing, often paired with strong male slaves, sometimes referred to as “bucks”, to produce what were seen as “healthy,” marketable children. These children were not intended to stay in Virginia; they were born to be sold.
In this system, pregnancy was not a private or sacred act but an enforced economic obligation. The enslaved womb became a tool of commerce.
This internal trade, estimated to have displaced over one million enslaved people between 1790 and 1860, became one of the most profitable industries in the South. And at the heart of it stood Virginia.
One of the most disturbing aspects of this era was the practice of “stockmen trade”, the renting out of strong, healthy Black men to other plantations for the sole purpose of impregnating enslaved women.
These men were selected for their physical attributes, height, strength, endurance, and often referred to as “studs,” a term borrowed from animal breeding. Plantation owners would pay to use these men to impregnate enslaved women on their properties, with the goal of producing “valuable” offspring who could be sold at high prices in the market.
These men had no choice in the matter. They were forced into sexual servitude, stripped of the right to love, to marry, or to form lasting family bonds. The women, likewise, had no autonomy. Both were treated as human livestock, their most personal relationships reduced to a breeding program.
The resulting children were usually sold away from both parents, further fueling the machinery of slavery in America.
Enslaved Africans were auctioned in Virginia cities like Richmond, Alexandria, and Petersburg, where traders like Franklin & Armfield, the owners of the largest slave trading firm in the country, ran massive operations that funnelled people into the Deep South.

Slave breeding was not just tolerated, it was underwritten by Virginia’s legal and social systems. The legal doctrine of partus sequitur ventrem, which meant that a child inherited the status of its mother, ensured that every child born to an enslaved woman became the legal property of the enslaver.
This made every pregnancy a guaranteed return on investment. Enslavers had every incentive to increase their “stock” through forced reproduction, and no law prohibited them from doing so. Families were routinely torn apart. Children, often as young as eight, were sold away from their mothers to meet the labour demands of the cotton South.
The inhuman practice of breeding enslaved Africans continued until the American Civil War (1861–1865). When the Union defeated the Confederacy, slavery was officially abolished through the 13th Amendment in 1865. This not only ended the legal ownership of human beings, but also destroyed the industry built around their reproduction and sale.
But while the system ended, its legacy remained. Generations of African Americans were shaped by the trauma of forced breeding, broken families, and stolen kinship, a history that continues to echo in the stories, identities, and struggles of their descendants.
You might find these articles interesting.
Pata Seca: The Enslaved African Breeder Who Produced Over 200 Children for His Master
How Enslaved Black Women Resisted Slave Breeding By Using Cotton Roots as Contraceptives
Slave Breeding in the US: How Enslaved Africans were Bred Like Livestock in the 19th Century
Lumpkin’s Jail: The 19th-Century American Slave Breeding Facility for Enslaved Africans
Sources:
https://books.google.com.ng/books?id=iwCKCgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
https://www.richmondfed.org/-/media/richmondfedorg/publications/research/econ_focus/2013/q2/pdf/economic_history.pdf
https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/franklin-and-armfield/
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14664658.2024.2317499